<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Public Parent &#187; books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.publicparent.com/tag/books/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.publicparent.com</link>
	<description>Thinking About Parenting in Public</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:00:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review: Outliers</title>
		<link>http://www.publicparent.com/75/book-review-outliers</link>
		<comments>http://www.publicparent.com/75/book-review-outliers#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>a daddy of two</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all ages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicparent.com/?p=75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Outliers is a book about people who are off the charts successful &#8211; what is the root cause for their success? Frequently, it is attributed to talent, genius, or other inherent traits. There is evidence that the attribution of success to intrinsics is harmful. Gladwell goes one step further and makes the point that it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.publicparent.com/75/book-review-outliers/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Right Baby Name</title>
		<link>http://www.publicparent.com/44/the-right-baby-name</link>
		<comments>http://www.publicparent.com/44/the-right-baby-name#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 04:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>a daddy of two</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre-birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicparent.com/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is something interesting I would like to share with you. The image to the right holds an entire baby naming theory. According to this theory, there are 3 major factors to think about when naming a baby: uniqueness, fit, and goodwill. Uniqueness is fairly self-explanatory, according to this graphic it depends on the name&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.publicparent.com/44/the-right-baby-name/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10,000 Hours!</title>
		<link>http://www.publicparent.com/65/10000-hours</link>
		<comments>http://www.publicparent.com/65/10000-hours#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>a daddy of two</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all ages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicparent.com/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his book &#8220;Outliers&#8221; Malcolm Gladwell makes the point that individuals who are outstanding in any given area have put in at least 10,000 hours of practice. Let us just assume for a second this is true (and the assertion that training is more important than innate ability is a good thing): What are the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.publicparent.com/65/10000-hours/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review: Nurture Shock</title>
		<link>http://www.publicparent.com/10/book-review-nurture-shock</link>
		<comments>http://www.publicparent.com/10/book-review-nurture-shock#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>a daddy of two</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all ages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicparent.com/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Popular science books are frequently more popular than scientific. Not Nurture shock &#8211; it boasts a 87 page appendix with acknowledgments, scientific notes and references to published articles. A few spot checks of the references against the well written and compelling content in the main body of the book were satisfactory, so I feel comfortable [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.publicparent.com/10/book-review-nurture-shock/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
